Fast Food, are we taking it too far by blaming fast food restaurants Research Paper

Fast Food, be we taking it too far by blaming unbendable nutriment restaurants for obesity - Research Paper ExampleOpponents of the fast aliment industry tend to comp ar fast f atomic number 18 to cigargonttes, saying that smoking one cigarette pack a day is not to a gr eliminateer extent harmful for health than work throughing three big macs a day. The concept of Big Food judicial proceeding was crafted along the line of Big Tobacco litigation. Cigarettes and fast victuals deteriorate health in their own respective ways, and there is nothing untrue about it. However, cigarettes are a means of function of smoke whereas food is fundamentally a source of nutrition, no matter how fatty that may be. binge can always cause obesity, whether or not fast food is consumed. If three big macs are to be equalized to one pack of cigarettes, this is no reason to sue the fast food companies because they never bear their customers to consume three big macs in a single day. It is up to the customers what they eat and how much they eat. Cigarettes are totally the pollutants for lungs whereas fast food is also rich in proteins and carbohydrates in addition to fats. If any food that contains fat and carbohydrate is to be blamed for obesity, health conscious people should apply to taking protein tablets and eat nothing, because anything they would eat would take aim some proportion of fat and carbohydrates in their contents. After all, it is the tempers decision, and is so because fats and carbohydrates are necessary for health, though if consumers can not keep themselves from overeating, it is they who should be sued kinda of the fast food companies.... any food that contains fat and carbohydrate is to be blamed for obesity, health conscious people should resort to taking protein tablets and eat nothing, because anything they would eat would have some proportion of fat and carbohydrates in their contents. After all, it is the natures decision, and is so because fats and carbohydrates are necessary for health, though if consumers can not keep themselves from overeating, it is they who should be sued instead of the fast food companies. Robert Sweet, the US District Judge rightly said, If consumers know (or reasonably should know) the potential macabre health effects of eating at McDonalds, they cannot blame McDonalds if they, nonetheless, choose to satiate their appetite with a nimiety of supersized McDonalds products (Sweet cited in Collins). In order to get to the root cause of the problem, it is useful to find out what has touch fast food companies to sell food rich in fat. Fat happens to be the most representative source of taste in any kind of food. Take a piece of bread and eat it, it wont taste good enough. Application of a spoonful of butter or discontinue on it would enhance its taste manifolds. Even in homes, people frequently make use of dairy products rich in fat content like cottage cheese, butter, cream and milk. In fact, there are many obese people who do not at all go to the fast food restaurants. Many people are genetically obese. Two children, who are brought up in similar circumstances, are of same age and consume same food can not be expected to have the same body mass index. One susceptibility be very skinny and the other might be obese. It is the way an individuals body reacts to the food consumed that makes a difference. Many people uphold on diet 24/7 and are yet obese. Yet there are others who