The Apology Of Socrates And Hebrew Bible Analysis

In the Apology of Socrates and Hebrew Bible, there are different structures of authority – the way the system works; people live their lives, or how they view their world. The Greek gods and the Hebrew God shape these people’s views and give them a sense of authority. The structures of authority evidently show in the Apology of Socrates while Socrates defends himself in court, and in the books of the Bible when the Jews follow God and how they judge others. Although the Athenians’ and Jews’ lives contrast sharply, the ways they devote themselves to their Gods is similar. First of all, there are several Greek gods, each one in charge of their realm. The gods are human-like, and need humans to remain mighty or to fulfill their desires†¦show more content†¦Socrates pulls the same philosophy on poets and craftsmen, and that is when he comes to his conclusion: if a person seems wise to many others, including himself, then it is Socrates’ job to show the person that he is only wise because he thinks he is wise, when in reality, he is not (21c and 21d). Socrates never makes people change their beliefs in their gods; he believes he is merely telling the truth to everyone he meets. However, the Athenians think it is unforgivable that Socrates does not believe in the same gods and speaks his mind. On the other hand, the Hebrew God is the only God in charge of everything. God does not need humans to continue being powerful. In fact, God wants to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah because â€Å"The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and their sin so grievous that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Genesis 18:20). The Hebrew God does not put up with sinful people. He does not need the people of Earth if they do not believe and obey him. However, God can be forgiving. After Moses has a baby with Sarah’s servant because he and Sarah get impatient for a child, God still gets Sarah pregnant with Isaac. (Genesis 17:16; 21:2-3). God is also merciful toward Lot and his family

Articles about Involvement in Gang Violence and Methods of...

In low income areas and large cities, gang violence is a major problem many parents hope their children will avoid. Unaffordability makes the option of relocating out of the question for the majority of families. Very few people from neighborhoods such as this are able to go to college because of the expense and lack of motivation from the students. Scholarships are the only hope for kids who grow up in environments like downtown Oakland or Berkeley, California. Scholarships can only be granted through outstanding skills in academics, sports, and extracurricular activities, though, not because a student has the ability to stab with a knife, torment innocent pedestrians on the street, or shoot a gun from a moving car. Solutions to†¦show more content†¦This resulted in Lawson abandoning the dream of a prosperous life followed by him retreating to the acceptance of gang life. Dohrmann’s article uses a strong voice of pathos as he describes several years of Lawson’ s life. The argument is entertaining. Having been published in Sports Illustrated the purpose was to be an engaging read, yet Dohrmann fails to state any specific claim to identify why he believes sports are not the solution for students to avoid gang involvement. His only proof is that such a dream was not attainable by Lawson and several other young men mentioned within the passage. The only statistics provided are irrelevant to the argument, but help the reader connect with Lawson on a more personal level. Dohrmann does make it clear that gang violence is growing, at least within the city limits of Oakland, California where â€Å"there were 127 homicides last year and 148 the year before, which was up 68% from 2004 [†¦] Gang violence in Oakland [was] so bad that last year Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger committed officers form the state’s highway patrol to help stem the violence† (401). Yet, he fails to state how this number has been affected because students have o r have not been involved in sports teams rather than gangs. The argument is well-organized, told in chronological order of Lawson’s journey. However, the article falls short when no specificShow MoreRelatedViolence in Youth1171 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction Youth violence is defined as violent behaviour that begins early in life and continues throughout subsequent stages of life. Youth violence may include physical and emotional harm, and minor crimes, escalating to murder (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013). Youth are recognized as being between the ages of twelve and twenty-four however, teens are the most affected by violence than any other group of youths as they are habitually perceived as the most violent age groupRead MoreThe Endless Battle with Prison Gangs1689 Words   |  7 PagesEndless Battle with Prison Gangs As the years pass, the rate of gang affiliated crimes in the Unites States has progressed extensively, accumulating more inmates into our major prisons doubling the maximum occupancy that the jails can hold. In the U.S there are currently 33,000 active violent street, motorcycle, and prison gangs with a recorded 1.4 million members combined. The registered number of police officers is a mere 683,396; which is not even half of our countries gang population. IncrediblyRead MoreJuvenile Crime Is The Number One Priority3511 Words   |  15 Pagesfederal laws preventing violence crimes are becoming more detailed and protected. However, it does not seem to stop criminals from committing illegal acts, especially for at-risk children in the city of Chicago. According to ABCNews, Chicago’s Murder rate is four time higher than New York City (Rosenzweig). Juvenile gang activities are without a doubt, a reality, and is increasing uncontrollably in the city of Chicago, IL. Even though t here is no universal definition for â€Å"gang†, the National InstituteRead MoreEssay about Gang Violence in Philadelphia2405 Words   |  10 Pagespresence of gangs, and the streets are run by unruly groups of fearless young adults. Gang violence in Philadelphia is a major issue, and the citizens will never be safe until gang prevention occurs. Gang prevention is not a simple task, but with the right resources available, it is possible. Gang violence is a problem that will contribute to the collapse of Philadelphia, and it has yet to be solved throughout many generations. With gang violence on the rise, the best solution to gang violence is to educateRead MoreNotes On Delinquency Prevention Programs4174 Words   |  17 PagesRunning head: DELINQUENCY PREVENTION PROGRAMS 1 16 17 Delinquency Prevention Programs Alton Johnson American Military University Abstract This research paper will describe a variety of delinquency prevention programs as well as why they are beneficial for today?s society. Pivotal questions regarding the purpose of delinquency programs will be addressed through proven and current research. These programs when coupled with increased parental involvement are proven to be more effectiveRead MoreAdolescent Violence And Youth Violence2265 Words   |  10 PagesAdolescent violence has turned into an expanding issue in the U.S. youth violence and young people raised in the 1990s and has stayed high. Youth are the in all probability gathering to be casualties or culprits of high school violence, however the after effects of teenager violence influence everybody. Youth brutality insights demonstrate this is a significant issue: A normal of 15 youngsters are killed every day in the U.S., and more than 80 percent of those are killed with firearms (Khey, 2008)Read MoreThe Subculture Of The United States2690 Words   |  11 Pages would like to know more about in the sociology field is the study of how people reject the primary society’s ideas about what values, beliefs and traditions they should follow. Within these subcultures we find the subculture of gangs. Every community has to deal with gangs in one way or another. Mostly we hear about gangs in big cities but there are gangs in every state of the United States of America. The history of gangs has been dated in America from the beginning with the gangs of New York City thatRead MoreEssay on School Safety: Protecting the Students1921 Words   |  8 PagesSafety: Protecting the Students For many students a positive academic environment is increasingly harder to obtain. This is mainly due to their lack of safety. Whether it be inside the classroom or out. Unfavorable situations at home, psychological stability, physical dangers and violence all contribute to this evident shortage. There have been investigations on how organizations, teachers and parents collaborate together in todays society to influence the students understanding of safetyRead MoreViolence Among Youth3553 Words   |  15 Pagesgreat nation. In India, 480 million are less than 19 years old. India has 20% of the world’s children. [1] The recent years have seen an unprecedented increase in youth violence, often lethal violence, all around the nation. Anecdotal evidence of increase in violence by young people against women and old people, of road rage, of violence in schools, and other violent actions to get whatever they want is alarming. This epidemic, as many social analysts called it, caused serious concern to both parentsRead MoreCaribbean Studies Internal Assesment4844 Words   |  20 PagesRecommendations Page 35. Bibliography Page 36. Appendix. Introduction Problem Statement Does the participation in extra-curricular activities impact the mentality( what do you mean by meantality) and academic performance of the students within Trinity College? Relevance of Topic to Caribbean Studies. I choose this topic in relevance to Caribbean Studies because it has become quite prominent amongst my colleagues for many of them choosing to be involved in extracurricular activities

Bankruptcy Prediction Models Multinorm Analysis †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Bankruptcy Prediction Models Multinorm Analysis. Answer: Introduction The current study critically evaluates the financial as well as non-financial performance of a firm with special reference to the operations of Air New Zealand. Air New Zealand is essentially a big passenger and flag carrier airline company with operations based in Auckland. Essentially, this airline runs scheduled passenger flights to nearly 21 domestic as well as 31 transnational destinations in around 19 nations. Essentially, this report stressing on analytical evaluation of performance of the company using non-financial measures refers to quantitative measures/dimensions of performance that are not reflected in monetary terms. Again, critical analysis of the corporation Air New Zealand using financial dimensions namely horizontal trend analysis can help in assessment of different components of financial assertions that in turn can assist in gaining better understanding of the position and performance of the corporation. The current section carries out horizontal trend analysis of the financial statements of Air New Zealand that reflects the changes in the overall amounts of corresponding items of financial assertions over a specific time period. Essentially, this can be considered to be an important tool that can be used for analysis of trend analysis. In this, the financial assertions for two periods are utilized in horizontal trend analysis. Essentially, the earliest period is normally referred to as the base period and diverse items on the pecuniary pronouncements for later period can be compared with different other items of the base period. Comparative balance sheet with horizontal trend analysis: AIR NEW ZEALAND LTD BALANCE SHEET Increase Fiscal year ends in June. NZD in millions except per share data. 2016-06 2015-06 Amount Percentage Assets Current assets Cash Cash and cash equivalents 1594 1321 273 20.666162 Short-term investments 92 103 -11 -10.67961165 Total cash 1686 1424 262 18.3988764 Receivables 300 298 2 0.67114094 Inventories 103 120 -17 -14.16666667 Prepaid expenses 73 71 2 2.816901408 Other current assets 177 69 108 156.5217391 Total current assets 2339 1982 357 18.01210898 Non-current assets Property, plant and equipment Gross property, plant and equipment 6314 6845 -531 -7.757487217 Accumulated Depreciation -2253 -2360 107 -4.533898305 Net property, plant and equipment 4061 4485 -424 -9.453734671 Equity and other investments 428 230 198 86.08695652 Goodwill 0 Intangible assets 102 127 -25 -19.68503937 Other long-term assets 202 70 132 188.5714286 Total non-current assets 4793 4912 -119 -2.422638436 Total assets 6775 7251 -476 -6.564611778 Liabilities and stockholders' equity 0 Liabilities 0 Current liabilities 0 Short-term debt 46 239 -193 -80.75313808 Capital leases 207 225 -18 -8 Accounts payable 448 453 -5 -1.103752759 Deferred income taxes 20 54 -34 -62.96296296 Deferred revenues 1055 1111 -56 -5.04050405 Other current liabilities 352 389 -37 -9.511568123 Total current liabilities 2128 2471 -343 -13.88101983 Non-current liabilities 0 Long-term debt 616 841 -225 -26.75386445 Capital leases 1453 1262 191 15.13470681 Deferred taxes liabilities 228 164 64 39.02439024 Other long-term liabilities 385 405 -20 -4.938271605 Total non-current liabilities 2682 2672 10 0.374251497 Total liabilities 4810 5143 -333 -6.474820144 Stockholders' equity 0 Common stock 2286 2252 34 1.509769094 Retained earnings -351 -351 Accumulated other comprehensive income 30 -144 174 -120.8333333 Total stockholders' equity 1965 2108 -143 -6.783681214 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity 6775 7251 -476 -6.564611778 Significant ratios The ratios that are essential in estimating the trends of business that is the situation in which the entity is currently in and the ways in which the business will react to the upcoming future events are called significant ratios. The ratios that are analysed below are the Quick ratio, Debt Equity ratio and the Net Profit ratio (Bodie, 2013). Quick Ratio Current Liabilities ($M) Current Assets ($M) Inventory ($M) Current Assets - Inventory Ratio FY 2012 1683 1700 170 1530 0.909 FY 2013 1710 1858 155 1703 0.996 FY 2014 1872 1827 169 1658 0.886 FY 2015 2128 1982 120 1862 0.875 FY 2016 2471 2339 103 2236 0.905 Quick ratio = Total Current Assets - Inventories/Total Current Liabilities The quick ratio represents the entitys liquidity on a short term basis. An entity has both short term and long term obligations. The short term obligations are those that are needed to be paid within the current financial year. Essentially the quick ratio measures the capability of the liquid assets of the entity in order to pay off the short term obligations. For instance a quick ratio of 1.8 reveals that $1.80 of liquid assets that is available for the purpose of covering the $1 worth of current liabilities. Therefore higher the liquidity or quick ratio of an entity better is its liquidity position (Healy Palepu, 2012). In the above table the quick ratio of Air New Zealand has been calculated for the past five financial years. The total current assets have been identified from the annual reports of the respective financial years and according to the formula the inventories have been subtracted from it and then divided by total current liabilities. Therefore the quick ratio that has been arrived at show the liquidity position of the company. In the financial year of 2012 the liquidity position of the group seems to be fine. In the financial year of 2013 the quick ratio even improves more lifting the entity to a much better liquidity position. Though the liquidity position of Air New Zealand worsens in the following two financial years but the entity seems to improve in the financial year of 2016 thus stabilizing the liquidity position of the entity (de Andrs, Landajo Lorca, 2012). Debt Equity Ratio Total Liabilities ($M) Shareholder's Equity ($M) Ratio FY 2012 3771 1688 2.2340 FY 2013 3796 1816 2.0903 FY 2014 3978 1872 2.1250 FY 2015 4810 1965 2.4478 FY 2016 5143 2108 2.4398 Debt Equity Ratio = Total Liabilities/ Shareholder's Equity Shareholder's Equity = Total assets - Total liabilities The Debt Equity ratio essentially measures the financial leverage of the entity. The debt equity ratio is measured by dividing the total liabilities of an entity by its share holders equity. The specific forecast or indication that is measured by the debt equity ratio is that the amount of debt that a company has been utilizing in order to finance its assets in relation to the value that is there in the shareholders equity. The debt equity ratio is also known as risk or gearing ratio. In case of a debt equity ratio the total liabilities is compared to the shareholders equity because this will specifically show the extent till which the entity is utilizing debts or borrowed sources of money in order to fund the projects of the company. Aggressive practices related to financial leveraging are often not recommended. This is because such activities are associated with high levels of risk. The earnings that are incurred by the entity may result in volatile earnings due to additional inter est expense (Li, 2015). The above table shows a more or less constant debt equity ratio. But such a value is high enough to indicate that the entity heavily indulges in financing from outside sources. The ratio though decreases in the financial year of 2013 but it increases in the following financial years. The entity indulging in financing from outside sources may continue such operations associated with high levels of risk, if and only if the returns from the project offset the cost of financing loans from outside. But if this is not the case then the group runs the risk of going bankrupt. Therefore initiative on the part of the management should be taken to look into the current situation and lower the rate of financial leverage of the entity (Weygandt, Kimmel Kieso, 2015). Net Profit Ratio Net Revenue ($M) Net Profit ($M) Ratio FY 2012 715 71 10.0704 FY 2013 898 182 4.9341 FY 2014 1013 262 3.8664 FY 2015 1161 327 3.5505 FY 2016 1542 463 3.3305 Net Profit ratio = Net Revenue / Net Profit The net profit ratio is calculated by dividing the net revenue that is incurred by the entity and is arrived at by deducting the operating expenses from the gross revenue, by the net profit that is incurred by the firm. The net profit ratio indicates the profitability of the entity and is always prepared for a row of past years in order to measure the performance of the entity on a continuous basis (Needles, Powers Crosson, 2013). In the above table as it can be observed the net profit ratio of the entity in the financial year of 2012 reaches great heights and obtains a value of 10.074, thus signifying a strong profitability position of the entity. But after 2013 the profitability falls steeply and becomes stable from the financial year of 2014. Therefore there should be much investigation into the fact that as to why the entity had incurred such high levels of profit in the financial year of 2013 and why the profitability abnormally did decrease after 2013. A major issue that should be noted while analysing the net profit ratio is that this ratio estimates or measures the performance of the firm on a short term basis and does not provide insight into the long term possibilities of the entity (Weil, Schipper Francis, 2013). Non-financial analysis (Attrition rate) Employees on (2016) No of employees left No of employees joined Current employees 9897 270 900 10527 Attrition rate =(270/100)/((9897+900))/100=2.45 From the above table, it can be inferred that the attrition rate of the organization is on the lower side, which is a positive sign for the organization. Conclusion Air New Zealand as a group has reached a stabilized position in the past three financial years. The liquidity position of the group is strong. But there are concerns regarding financing resources from outside. The over indulgence of the entity in financial leveraging activity should be looked into. The entity should try to finance its projects out of its retained earnings. The management of the firm should look into the operating activities of the firm and if required chalk out a turnaround plan to increase the profitability of the entity. References Bodie, Z. (2013). Investments. McGraw-Hill. de Andrs, J., Landajo, M., Lorca, P. (2012). Bankruptcy prediction models based on multinorm analysis: An alternative to accounting ratios. Knowledge-Based Systems, 30, 67-77. Healy, P. M., Palepu, K. G. (2012). Business analysis valuation: Using financial statements. Cengage Learning. Li, X. (2015). Accounting conservatism and the cost of capital: An international analysis. Journal of Business Finance Accounting, 42(5-6), 555-582. Needles, B. E., Powers, M., Crosson, S. V. (2013). Principles of accounting. Cengage Learning. Weil, R. L., Schipper, K., Francis, J. (2013). Financial accounting: an introduction to concepts, methods and uses. Cengage Learning. Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., Kieso, D. E. (2015). Financial Managerial Accounting. John Wiley Sons.

Marijuanas history in the United States Essay Example

Marijuanas history in the United States Essay Marijuanas history in the United States dates back to its colonization. In fact many prominent historical American figures such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson have grown marijuana on plantations. This was mostly for the plants fiber known as hemp. Although in Washingtons case there are suspicions of weather or not he was growing for personal use as well (Andrews p. 403). But even with our presidents growing pot it was still largely unknown as a drug of abuse until the early 1940s when it was becoming popular among famous jazz musicians such as Miles Davis, and Charlie Mingus, and due to the fact that most jazz musicians who were using marijuana in this time period were black, white America saw it as a low class black mans drug. (www. erowid. org/plants/cannabis/cannabis_timeline. php3). This led to white America launching what is known as the Reefer Madness campaign. A propaganda campaign built on lies and hearsay such as, marijuana smokers, or dope fiends as the Reefer Madness films referred to them, are deviant criminals who will murder you in the street for drug money (Andrews p. 229). The campaign seemed to be working during the 40s and 50s because marijuana was still largely unknown to middle America, but in the 60s marijuana use came back in a big way with young college students, hippies, and popular musicians (Earleywine p. 295). This led people to see the truth about marijuana. We will write a custom essay sample on Marijuanas history in the United States specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Marijuanas history in the United States specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Marijuanas history in the United States specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer That it is relatively harmless and can be used safely for recreation. Which brings us to today and the debate about whether or not marijuana should be legalized. Today in the United States Marijuana is classified as a DEA schedule I drug in all of its forms. A drug that is classified as DEA schedule I is a drug that has a high potential for abuse, has no accepted medial use in treatment in the united states, and has a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug under medical supervision. This federal scheduling was disputed in 1988 by judge Francis Young, an administrative law judge for the DEA, who recommended that marijuana be re-classified as schedule II on the grounds that if a respectable minority of doctors endorse it then it has a currently accepted medical use. (www. erowid. org/psychoactives/law). But even with the efforts of people like Judge Young, the United States is known for having fairly harsh marijuana penalties. In Britain marijuana is schedule I class B, and on July 10th 2002 was moved from class B to class C due to the British home secretary David Blunkett. Now in Britain simple possession is treated on a simple seize and warn basis. After making the decision to downgrade marijuanas scheduling Blunkett said that Cannabis is a potentially harmful drug and should remain illegal. However, it is not comparable with crack, heroin, or ecstasy. A greater differentiation between drugs which kill and drugs that cause harm is both scientifically justified and educationally sensible. (www. guardian. co. uk/drugs/story/0,2763,580507,00. html). Since this move towards decriminalization the United Kingdoms street crime numbers have been cut in half. The numbers of robberies and muggings in southern London have fallen nearly 50 percent. And in the Lambeth borough police reported 468 robberies and muggings in April as compared with the 916 last October (www. norml. org/index. cfm? Group_ID=5309). Canada is another country that is making steps toward decriminalization. On September 4 2002 members of a special Senate committee unanimously urged Parliament to amend federal law to allow for the regulated use possession and distribution of marijuana for recreational use and medicinal purposes. The committee said in its 600 page report that Scientific evidence overwhelmingly indicates that cannabis is substantially less harmful than alcohol and should be treated not as a criminal issue but as a social and public health issue Whether or not an individual uses marijuana should be a personal choice that is not subject to criminal penalties. [Therefore,] we have come to the conclusion that, as a drug, it should be regulated by the state much as we do for wine and beer, hence our preference for legalization over decriminalization. (http://www. norml. org/index. cfm? Group_ID=5405). The researchers believe that marijuana prohibition poses a greater risk to health that marijuana use. They said in their report that We believe that the continued prohibition of cannabis jeopardizes the health and well-being of Canadians much more then does the substance itself or the regulated market of the substance. In addition, we believe that the continued criminalization of cannabis undermines the fundamental values set out in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Canada has also seen a drop in serious crime as a result of lax marijuana enforcement over the past decade. So if decriminalizing pot in other countries has worked than why cant it work in the United States. Studies show that Marijuana is safer then cigarettes and alcohol (http://www. norml. org/index. cfm? Group_ID=5405), and that decriminalization will allow law enforcement agencies to concentrate their efforts on more serious problems, and will generate more money for the economy. Studies show that the health issues that marijuana raises are actually less hazardous then cigarettes. Studies also show that marijuana is not a gateway drug, it does not lead to the commission of crime, and that users are not likely to become dependent. One study also showed that it is easier for underage teens to obtain pot then tobacco (http://www. norml. org/index. cfm? Group_ID=5386) despite the fact that tobacco is targeted at adolescents (Shepard, Greene p. 213). This shows that our nations drug war is failing and that our resources need to be targeted elsewhere. Canadian justice minister agrees with this statement saying that If you look at the system [America] has in place, keeping marijuana criminal is not very efficient, police currently spend too much time and resources prosecuting marijuana offenders. (http://www. norml. org/index. cfm?Group_ID=5350). Legalizing marijuana would also have positive effects as well. A Nevada proposal to regulate and tax marijuana use by adults would raise an additional $28. 6 million in annual state revenue, according to a study by the Center for Business and Economic Research at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas (UNLV). The Center based its financial calculations by estimating that 75,000 people five percent of the states population would use an average of 12 grams of marijuana per month. The Center imposed the same tax rate on marijuana that already exists on tobacco products (http://www.norml. org/index. cfm? Group_ID=5439). In conclusion marijuana should be legalized in the United States for not only medicinal but recreational use as well. The evidence makes it obvious that marijuana is not dangerous and can make our country better if we legalize it. The appointees in the Shaffer commission knew it when they recommended the decriminalization of pot to President Nixon in 72 (www. erowid. org/plants/cannabis/cannabis_timeline. php3), Jimmy Carter knew it when he endorsed the decriminalization of marijuana in 77, and now you know it.