Shaw and Barry Essay - 934 Words

Module 2 – Written Assignment 1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each and use examples. Two different forms of utilitarianism are described in our text. The first is called act utilitarianism. According to Shaw and Barry, act utilitarianism states that we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected (p.60). The second form of utilitarianism is called rule utilitarianism. According to our text, this form of utilitarianism maintains that the utilitarian standard should be applied, not to individual actions, but to moral codes as a whole (Shaw Barry, p.76). Rule Utilitarianism is†¦show more content†¦The third principle is that no one is entitled to a holding except by (repeated) applications of principle 12 (Shaw Barry, p.115). Simply put Nozick theorized that you are entitled to your holdings, meaning money, property, goods as long as you acquired them justly (without violating anyone elses rights). 4. Two main features of John Rawlss theory of distributive justice are particularly important. What are these two features? Describe them. Rawls strive to determine how we can make a society as just as possible. Rawls derives two principles; liberty principle and the difference principle. He also gives a theoretical device that he calls â€Å"the original position† and â€Å"the veil of ignorance† this device is meant to help us in the way that we picture our self behind a veil. We do not know the basic things about ourselves like our sex, age, financial status etc. This device is to help us be totally neutral in the sense that we do not know our status in society. After putting our self in a status quo if you will, we can now decide on what us just for the whole society. Rawls derives then the difference principle. To put this is Rawls own words, the difference principle is: â€Å"Then the difference principle is a strongly egalitarian conception in the sense that unless there is a distribution that makes both persons better off an equal distribution is to be preferredShow MoreRelatedBusiness Ethi cs786 Words   |  4 Pages1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each and use examples. The two forms of utilitarianism are act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism states we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected. If its consequences bring more net good than those of any alternative course of action, then this action is the right one and the oneRead MoreEthics Module 21166 Words   |  5 Pages 1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each and use examples. The two forms of utilitarianism that Shaw and Barry refer to are act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. The act utilitarianism states that we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected. If its consequences bring more net good than those of any alternative course of action, thenRead MoreBusiness Ethics-Written Assignment for Module 2 Essay1536 Words   |  7 Pages Business Ethics Written Assignment for Module 2 1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms. Briefly describe each and use examples. Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism are the two different forms of utilitarianism that Shaw and Barry distinguish. Utilitarianism refers to the greatest happiness principle for the most amounts of people. Act utilitarianism â€Å"states that we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in aRead MoreThe Ethical Responsibilities Of Business Ethics Essay1737 Words   |  7 Pagescomplicated than business, in addition it emphasis the ethical responsibilities of business (Shaw, 2013, p.3). Business ethics is about how the people conduct the business and make ethical business decisions. In the case, the situation that Jean involved in is Wright expects Jean to use closing techniques to deceive her clients based on exaggerated and faked facts to increase the number of closed deals (Shaw, 2014, p.234). However, Jean strongly disagrees to use psychological manipulation, becauseRead MoreJohn Rawls s Theory Of Justice868 Words   |  4 Pagesfresh start (Shaw Barry , 2016). This theory and other theories proposed by Rawls encourage individuals to make objective decisions in business and in everyday life that allow for cooperative efforts to take place and for positive changes to be made within society. Why is this? Under the original position we would all choose a society that held fundamental liberties for everyone and would hold that inequalities only be allowed if they would benefit the least fortunate (Shaw Barry, 2016). ThisRead MoreViews on Corporate Social Responsibility Essay1005 Words   |  5 Pagesmotivate or attract employees, customers or investors, or to receive some taxation gains (Shaw Barry, 2011). This view is close to old traditional economic theories. For example the invisible-hand argument, based on studies of Adam Smith, states invisible hand of market affects all market participants’ actions and leads to general good. Any outside interference is not needed and only harms business (Shaw Barry, 2011). Also the â€Å"narrow† view is believed to protect interests of shareholders of corporationsRead MoreComm 101984 Words   |  4 Pagesraise? The moral issues about the Ford Pinto is that they take their profit is more important than human life. They also did not inform the consumer about the facts of the Pinto. Lastly, they also lobbied the safety of the car to lowest standard (Shaw, Barry amp; Sansbury 2009, pp 97-99). ï ¼Ë†44 wordsï ¼â€° 2. Suppose Ford officials were asked to justify their decision. What moral principles do you think they would invoke? Assess Ford’s handling of the Pinto from the perspective of each of the moralRead MoreModule 6 - Original Assignment839 Words   |  4 Pageswe have done very poorly in treating our fellow human with the dignity and respect we expect to be treated ourselves in return. If we were to do as Kant said, to treat â€Å"their ends as our end, we would all be treating each other impartially, (Shaw and Barry, 2013, pg. 90). But, since we are not, we are still having this dialogue. Affirmative action was brought upon by necessity. It was adopted in order to shift the balance toward neutrality in such things as hiring practice, admission standardsRead MoreComm 1011470 Words   |  6 PagesPrinciples of Responsible Commerce Tutorial Preparation Week 3 (The Ford Pinto) 1. What moral issues does the Pinto case raise? The Ford Pinto case in (Shaw, Barry amp; Sansbury 2009, p97) stated that Ford decided to continue produce the Pinto without making an improvement regardless of consumers’ safety because its prototype tests did not meet the safety requirement of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. They should not put the value of money prioritise than human life. FirstlyRead MoreAnalysis Of Jean Mcguire s Closing The Deal Essay1475 Words   |  6 PagesJean â€Å"lacks technique† (Shaw, 2014, p. 236). Jean McGuire has a decision to make on which sales technique she is going to use, Wright uses â€Å"the other party† technique (Shaw, 2014), this motivates people to buy the lot as the buyer thinks there is a lot of interest in the lot and if it is not acted upon quickly it could sell. Wright says â€Å"This first move generally increases the prospects interest in the property, and more important to us, in closing the deal pronto† (Shaw, 2014, p. 234). Jean is not